UA Archaeologist, Colleagues Find No Evidence of Catastrophic Impact

Anthropology professor Vance T. Holliday and others take issue with claims that a comet strike led to the demise of Paleoindian megafauna hunters during the Pleistocene.
Sept. 30, 2010
Vance T. Holliday
Vance T. Holliday
At the center of the photo, a Clovis spear point can be seen lodged in the skeleton of a mammoth excavated by UA archaeologist Emil W. Haury at Naco, Ariz., in 1952. (Photo courtesy Arizona State Museum)
At the center of the photo, a Clovis spear point can be seen lodged in the skeleton of a mammoth excavated by UA archaeologist Emil W. Haury at Naco, Ariz., in 1952. (Photo courtesy Arizona State Museum)
Example of a Clovis fluted blade. (Image courtesy of the Arizona State Museum)
Example of a Clovis fluted blade. (Image courtesy of the Arizona State Museum)

The notion of an object such as a comet or asteroid striking the Earth and wiping out entire species is compelling, and sometimes there's good evidence for it. Most scientists now agree that a very large object from space crashed into what is now the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico 65 million years ago, altering climate patterns sufficiently to end the age of the dinosaurs.

The theory was backed up by supporting evidence, and while not everyone in the scientific community was on board at first, it's now generally accepted.

For about three years, a similar controversy has been brewing about the end of the Pleistocene, when ice sheets covered large parts of the planet and animal behemoths foraged the landscape. Prehistoric hunters developed sophisticated strategies and tool kits for bringing down mammoths and other megafauna.

Did a comet striking one of those ice fields in North America nearly 13,000 years ago sufficiently alter climate enough to wipe out these animals and collapse the cultures that hunted them?

A new study published in Current Anthropology argues that whether or not such an extraterrestrial event occurred, nothing in the archaeological record indicates that the Clovis hunters suddenly disappeared along with the animals. 

Vance T. Holliday, a professor in the University of Arizona School of Anthropology and the department of geosciences, and David J. Meltzer, an archaeologist at Southern Methodist University, studied evidence from a number of archaeological sites and concluded that it was more likely that hunting populations shifted their subsistence patterns to hunting other animals.

The controversy began several years ago when scientists cited evidence of an extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago somewhere around the Great Lakes caused the Younger Dryas climate changes, the extinction of several large mammal species and the collapse of the Paleoindians whose large, fluted spear points – first found near Clovis, N.M. – were likely designed for hunting very big game animals.

Supporters of the comet theory point out that few Clovis sites continued to be occupied after their inhabitants stopped making large projectile points. Those few old Clovis sites that are reoccupied by post-Clovis people also show a significant passage of time – as much as five centuries – between them.

Holliday and Meltzer, bolstered by radiocarbon dates from more than 40 sites, counter that most prehistoric sites are kill sites where game was dispatched and butchered, and not likely to be continuously occupied. Gaps across time and the disappearance of Clovis points, they said, were more likely the result of shifting settlement patterns brought about by the nature of a nomadic existence.

"Whether or not the proposed extraterrestrial impact occurred is a matter for empirical testing in the geological record," Holliday writes. "Insofar as concerns the archaeological record, an extraterrestrial impact is an unnecessary solution for an archaeological problem that does not exist."